Election by animals
Dogs are often better judges of character than most people
You can tell a lot about a someone by how dogs react to them. Whether the reaction is loving acceptance, fearful cowering, or snarling attacks - their instincts are usually pretty good.
I wouldn’t vote for a candidate who even dogs couldn’t like*. So even if the election can’t entirely decided by dogs, every presidential debate should include some dogs on the moderator panel.
- A recent NY Times article about Joe Biden’s dogs mentioned that the former guy was the first prez in over a century who ＊didn’t＊ have any pets. Put whatever construction you like on that, but I think it was equal parts that he could never care about anyone but himself - and that most dogs would turn on him even if he was handing out bacon.
I'm resharing this here, because it's trans-species inclusive way to do politics, it's funny and makes sense, if you think about it.
Credits: a1 of HalfBakery.
+[企画]
おかしい〜犬はとてもかわいいので、気に入らなくてもかまいません。 質問：犬はどの受容体を使って判断しますか？代わりに電子受容体を使用できますか？
有趣〜狗很可爱，不喜欢就不搭理你。 疑问：狗是通过什么感受器来判断的？可不可以用电子感受器来代替？
//質問：犬はどの受容体を使って判断しますか？ //
そうですね、犬はどのような人間の特徴に敏感であり、それらの特徴をどのように抽出するのですか？ 今、あなたはAIが犬に取って代わることができる方法について話している...
// 疑问：狗是通过什么感受器来判断的？ //
Right, so, what human features are dogs sensitive to, and how to extract those features? Now, you're talking of how AI could replace dogs...