my apologies i was delusional, enabled by ai in nmy ignorance I deleted the original paper i posted The project of spicetime and ethical DiAI is viable and ongoing I v done some learning and rethinking and achieved allmy goals, originally sought for from engagement with qm, thru other techniques, rooted in more solid practices. Ill be posting results and updates Im very excited and confident of the progress and outcome of the project Cheers.

At first glance, it looks like you made some insights, similar to these ones by great minds: "The computer changed intuitionistic mathematics from ideology to reality." [von Neuman] And this: "Just as physics is a mathematical treatment of energy changes in a system, computation theory is a mathematical treatment of information changes in a system." [Raymond T. Yeh] However, these connections, while exist, and to some will be obvious, need to work to become useful. If you are trying to look at the mindspace as timespace, you will find mindspace to be like infinite-dimensional timespace, that's for sure. Same mathematics? Yes. However, quantum gravity? I haven't heard of a working theory of quantum gravity yet.

How can we benefit everybody as much as possible? I really don't know. But this is a very important topic (to me) that I love to discuss. The answer might depend on how we define the word "benefit". Well being? in a long-term view or short-sighted monetary/comfort sense? Shouldn't our aim in society to benefit everybody? I'm with you. 100%. But in order for something to last, it shouldn't be the main focus but something that comes as a side-effect (emergence?). And, this is just my opinion. Some questions can't be answered easily. And, some can't be, at all (not from a defeatist mindset, but seeing right in the eyes of something that seems unanswerable, gives me pure joy!). To me, keeping these questions in mind while going through our life is the key. One can always find a reason to do/not-do. If you ask me, it's the question of well being and intelligence. Well being of an individual or everyone? If you see deep enough, there exists no individual without others and vice versa. To be more direct: we're embedded in our environment and focusing on one's own (depends on how greedy (in RL/CS sense) you are) life is just being short-sighted.

Two points: We can start rolling out the lightest part of it - the tip - right now! The strength required by the tether is not the same across its length - to minimize weight, it has to be tapering off towards the Earth's end, with very light tip. So, let's find a suitable geostationary sattelite in orbit already, and bring some tape (tether) to it. Space junk that's already in orbit, is great for the counterweight construction. It requires much less fuel to lift the junk into the geostationary orbit, than to lift it up from Earth surface.

I think this might be a bad aim for individuals. For example, suppose I have a child. If I were to aim to benefit everybody, then I would have to neglect my child. I think that maximizing (benefiting everybody as much as possible) also might not be a good aim: we need rest and leisure, time to ourselves, in order not to burn out.