Software principles
What do you think software should have?
+
–
–
Software has some requirements for me to use it.
This is to discuss as a community what software - including web applications should consider.
想法 Local first software
Software should be designed to work locally first, without needing a server side component
想法 Self hosted personal data
My name, address, bank details, credit card number should be self hosted by me or by my data provider - I shouldn't have to give the data to every company that asks
+[想法]
+[项目]
Local first software
A long article about local first software
从打字、结构化、日志记录、构建、发布、划分和组合服务，如何编写高质量的软件有完整的理念……然而，所有这一切都取决于格式和标准的特定选择以及中短期目标。
例如，并不是每个人在研究阶段都必须坚持严格的工程要求——快速建造半成品火箭并再次尝试比精心设计缺乏关键能力（例如，能力来返回陆地）。
因此，在考虑软件时，可能存在截然不同的需求和原则：
There's entire philosophy for how good quality software should be written from typing, structuring, logging, building, releasing, dividing into and combining from services... however, all that depends on particular choices of formats and standards and short-medium-long term goals.
For example, not everyone has to stick to stringent engineering requirements in the research phase -- it's easier to rapidly build a half-baked rocket and try again, than to meticulously design a masterpiece, that lacks a key ability (e.g., ability to come back to land).
And so, wildly different requirements and principles may exist, when thinking of software:
根据我的经验，当有人说某物干净或美丽时，我不同意。我觉得一个人的美是另一个人的垃圾🤣
我同意你关于尝试一些事情并看看什么是有效的。 WordPress 就是一个很好的例子。我认为 wordpress 是非常好的软件，但很多缺乏经验的开发人员认为它很糟糕。但是这些开发人员在他们的生活中并没有做出任何重要的事情。
我倾向于软件开发的工具制作和实践领域。
有些开发人员认为 Haskell 和 Clojure 是游戏规则的改变者，但随后他们产生了难以理解的丑陋混乱，除了他们的作者之外没有人能理解，这不是因为他们的代码很漂亮或其他人没有经验。
In my experience when someone says something is clean or beautiful I have disagreed. I think one man's beauty is another man's garbage 🤣
I agree with you with regard to trying things out and seeing what works. WordPress is a good example of that. I think wordpress is very good software but a lot of subpar inexperienced developers think it's bad. But those developers haven't made anything significant in their lives.
I lean on the tool making and practical realm of software development.
Theres developers who think Haskell and Clojure are game changers but then they produce unreadable ugly messes that nobody but their author can understand and it's not because their code is beautiful or that others are inexperienced.