Money valuation as a continuous wave function like the stock market
Imagine being capable of affording something really expensive one minute but not the next? This is how dynamic production could be
Your money can be worth a different amount of money over time, based on your contributions to society.
If you do 8 hours of work, your money should suddenly be worth more.
If you accept a lot of free things and do no work, your money should be worth less.
+[项目]
你没有具体说明这将如何工作......那么如何？
You didn't specify the how this would work exactly... So how?
在爱尔兰有一种叫做股票市场的酒吧，菜单项目的价格显示在电视显示屏上，价格会随着时间的推移在夜间发生变化。如果你等待它，你可以便宜地得到饮料或食物。
有一些算法使股市酒吧对访问者很有趣。
现在，社会是由很多人组成的，每个人每一秒都在贡献着不同的东西。
一些人（消费者）贡献了对产品的需求：水、电、食品，它们为他人创造了工作。这是一件好事。我们需要将该需求表示为波函数的一部分。所以我们需要某种方式来检测事物的需求，数字会计系统可以解决这个问题。例如智能手机上带有按钮的应用程序。或数字 NFC 键控商店和工作场所。
每个人都在看电视时，没有做任何工作，打开水壶时，用电量上升。
我认为有些人比其他人为更好的社会做出了贡献。我认为快递员、厨师、超市物流等基本工人是文明文明的重要人物。它们允许社会的其他部分发挥作用。不幸的是，这些职位没有声望，也没有得到绝大多数社会的尊重。不幸的是，受过教育的人不愿意做这些工作，因为经济激励意味着他们可以在其他地方得到更多。
拥有财富的人比每天被迫劳动的人更懒惰，他们在经济上创造了更多的财富，但他们在世界上做的实际工作也更少。在一个地区养活 1000 人比创造数十亿美元的收入更为重要。
我不想强迫每个人都高效，这与我的目标背道而驰。
我希望那些做最多工作的人能够得到他们能负担得起的回报。所以即使是一个穷人也应该得到他提供的1000个富人的产出。
波函数在工作完成时产生较高的数值，而在没有工作完成时产生较低的数值。
这是一个力量倍增器。需求信号真的很有价值，当你在餐厅并且对某个菜单项目有需求时，你会为需求做更多的准备。
同样，笔记本电脑或手机制造商生产更多需求量大的产品。需求信号本身很有价值，但没有人为此付费。
人们应该为他们的需求信号付费，因为它协调社会并协调资源的最佳使用以实现互利。
波函数被添加到你拥有的钱上，这增加了你购买的力量，并在系统中充当额外的钱。
In Ireland there's something called the stock market bar, where prices of menu items are displayed on a television display, the prices change over time over the night. You can get a drink or food cheaply if you wait for it.
There's some algorithm which causes the stock market bar to be entertaining to those who visit.
Now, society is composed of many people, and each person is contributing a different thing every second.
Some people (consumers) contribute demand for products: water, electricity, food which generates work for others. This is a good thing. We need to represent that demand as part of a wave function. So we need some way of detecting demand for things, digital accounting systems can solve this problem. Such as an app on a smartphone with a button. Or digital NFC keyed shops and workplaces.
When everyone is watching television, no work is being done and when the kettle is turned on, the use of electricity goes up.
I think some people contribute to a better society than other people. I think essential workers such as delivery drivers, chefs and supermarket logistics are very important people for civilized civilization. They allow the rest of society to function. Unfortunately there is no prestige in these positions and they are not respected by the vast majority of society. Unfortunately, educated people are not willing to do these kinds of jobs due to economic incentives mean they can get more elsewhere.
People who have wealth are lazier than people who are forced into labour everyday, economically they produce more wealth but they also do less actual work in the world. Feeding 1000 people in a local area is more fundamentally essential than generating $billions in revenues.
I don't want to force everyone to be productive, that's the opposite of my goal.
I want the people who do the most work to be rewarded by what they can afford. So even a poor person should deserve the output of 1000 rich persons he provides for.
The wave function produces a higher number when work is done and a low number when no work is being done.
This is a force multiplier. The demand signal is really valuable, when you're in a restaurant and there is a demand for a certain menu item, you cook more of that kind of item in preparation for the demand.
Likewise, a laptop or phone manufacturer produces more of the kind of item that has high demand. The demand signal itself is valuable but nobody is paid for it.
People should be paid for their demand signal, as it coordinates society and orchestrates best use of resources for mutual profitability.
The wave function is added to what money you do have, and this increases the power of your purchases and acts as additional money in the system.
我的印象是金钱已经这样运作了（例如，机票价格波动使廉价旅行有时更实惠，也有各种廉价交易机会，称为“抛售”等，而金钱的价值是非常有背景的和多重：例如，一个单位的货币值一杯咖啡和去该国另一边的旅行，有时价格相同），但它没有可视化，也没有专注于让社会阶层看到机会.是不是你提议的——是一些系统来可视化它，并帮助缓解财富不平等？
My impression is that money already works like that (e.g., air ticket price fluctuation makes cheap travel more affordable at times, there are also various cheap deal opportunities, called "sell-offs", etc., and the value of money is very contextual and multiple: e.g., a single unit of currency being worth a cup of coffee AND a trip to another side of the country, sometimes at the same price), but it's not visualized, and not focused on making the opportunities apparent to segments of society. Is it that what you're proposing -- is some system to visualize that, and help alleviate the wealth inequality?
我建议直接根据那个人来评估人的钱的价值。
所以钱不仅仅是一个数字，这个数字有购买力，但有一个递归函数 person_x(person_y(society_valuation((f(person_z, numeric amount, person_z_demand_history, person_z_work_or_additions_to_society)))) = 购买力。
我认为此时金钱的估值是看不见的。
I suggest that the value of people's money be directly valued based on that person.
So money isn't just a number, and that number has buying power but that there is a recursive function person_x(person_y(society_valuation((f(person_z, numerical amount, person_z_demand_history, person_z_work_or_additions_to_society)))) = buying power.
I think the valuation of money is invisible at this time.